Ken Schwaber and Scott Ambler on ITConversations

I found two excellent lectures on IT Conversations that I would like to recommend to people looking at how to learn (or justify) agile development methods. The first lecture was given by Ken Schwaber, the creator of the Scrum project management methodology, called You Thought it was Easy: Wrestling Gold from Today’s Software Projects. In this 40 minute discussion, Ken explains what Scrum is and how it works. Its a very informative lecture that has helped a lot in giving me additional ways to try to explain the advantages of Scrum as a project management methodology.

One of the interesting points that Ken brings up is that when you introduce an empirical model like Scrum, all of the things that have been wrong in your environment for such a long time come to the surface and have to be dealt with. We have definitely seen this in our environment and it has caused some discomfort on the team. For me, its very nice to have a lecture like this that I can refer team members to that explains that this is a normal part of the process. It is, however, extremely difficult to explain to some that the problems we are seeing have been around for quite a long time, but that we have been unable to quantify them until implementing Scrum.

The second lecture was given by Scott Ambler and is called Are you Agile or are you Fragile in which Scott tries to explain the advantages of Agile methods and answer some of the arguments one would get in justifying using Agile methods on actual projects. There are a couple of interesting things about this lecture. First, he runs it as an agile project, eliciting “requirements” or topics from the audience and having them prioritize them. Secondly is the passion in which Scott talks about Agile methods and his no nonsense way of explaining the advantages.

This lecture gave me a great quote that stuck with me. “A new requirement is a competitive advantage - if I can act on it”. I found this to be a brilliant reframe of the common objection to changing requirements that happens on teams which have been “raised” on the waterfall type of approach where requirements are finalized and cannot change without having been “wrong” in the first place. This lecture is a long one, weighing in at one hour and 55 minutes.

For those teams out there that are attempting to implement agile methods in an environment that has been historically waterfall and “predictive planning” based, these two lectures are definitely something you should check out.

Related posts

Tagged with: ,

Adam Curry Experiments with “Soundvertising”

For a few podcasts now, Adam Curry has been referring to something he has dubbed “Soundvertising”, in which during his podcast he asks his audience to stop what they are doing, and remember where you are, and look around you and focus on one object as he says the word “Senseo“, a coffee machine that he has been promoting on his web site. He then tells his audience that he guarantees that every single time you look at that item, you will hear the word “Senseo”.

Adam then wondered if there was something to that, and if an advertising model could be built around it.

On episode 240, he played a snippet from the “Across the Sound” podcast in which the podcaster was talking about the fact that he was at a Starbucks listening to Adams podcast during one of these “experiments” and he found that he now associates the Starbucks logo with the Senseo.

I was actually surprised to hear that people were surprised by this “phenomenon” as this has been documented since the 1970’s when Richard Bandler and John Grinder came out with a model of human experience and therapy that they called NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) in which the human experience is broken up into “representational systems” (visual / auditory / kinesthetic). Their argument was that all human experience, both internal and external, is represented to the brain in one of these representational systems.

Part of their model was a technique called “Anchoring”, in which you can bring a person to the peak of a particular state, and touch them or position yourself visually, or even use a certain tone of voice and be able to re-access that state by replicating the action in which you anchored them. The Neuro Linguistic Programming Glossary defines anchoring the following way:

The process of associating an internal response with some external trigger (similar to classical conditioning) so that the response may be quickly, and sometimes covertly, re-accessed. Anchoring can be visual (as with specific hand gestures), auditory (by using specific words and voice tone), and kinesthetic (as when touching and arm or laying a hand on someone’s shoulder). Criteria for anchoring:

a) intensity or purity of experience;
b) timing; at peak of experience;
c) accuracy of replication of anchor.

Tony Robbins (author of Unlimited Power : The New Science Of Personal Achievement, the book that actually gave NLP a ton of attention in the 80’s through his Personal Power infomercials) defines anchoring with the following definition:

The process by which any representation (internal or external) gets connected to and triggers a subsequent string of representations and responses. Anchors can be naturally occurring or set up deliberately. An example of an anchor for a particular set of responses is what happens when you think of the way a special, much-loved person says your name.

Here’s a good example of auditory and visual anchoring. When I was a kid, my father was one of those people that did not get angry easily. He had a lot of patience. However, when he got really angry he would have a particular tone in his voice that would actually cause a lot of fear in his kids. I remember to this day hearing that tone in his voice and seeing the expression he has on his face and the fear which it triggered in me, knowing I had finally pushed him over the edge. That is an anchor that spans across representational systems. It still elicits an emotional response in me to this day, and all I have to do is imagine the tone and picture him using it in the way he did at the time.

Here’s another example. I was in a facilitation class in which we were required to be video taped facilitating a session with a group. I picked a strategy format for my presentation in which the goal was to move to a zero downtime environment during deployment of new software to the production systems. At the opening, I used position in front of the audience to mark points in time from the year 2000 over on the audiences left hand side (Americans internally represent time from left to right) and 3 years from now to their right. I then moved over to the right most side of the time-line I had drawn positionally on the floor and asked the group what the systems looked like “now”. When the group got caught up in certain problems that we had now, I was able to, with my hand, point to their left and say “we’ve already solved that back there, so lets describe what the environment looks now” (while pointing to where I was currently standing) and see an immediate shift in the level of anxiety in the group, allowing them to describe the problem as if it was in the past and talk about what we “did” to solve it, even though we hadn’t gone through those exercises yet. The presentation was only 10 minutes in length, but it was a great learning experience for me in the power of anchoring.

One final example. In a podcast in the Manager Tools series on One on Ones, the hosts talked about a new manager that began having One on Ones in his office soon after taking his position. He found that his employees were extremely stressed when they came to his office for their One on One sessions. After some time he spent asking questions, he found that the previous person in his position used to call people into this office to ream them and that they called the room the “Room of Pain”. This is a very good example of a location based anchor in which multiple representational systems are involved and the response was attached to the room in which the manager was having his sessions. When he switched the location of the One on One sessions, he changed the way in which his employees reacted to the sessions.

According to the many books I’ve read on the subject of NLP, when you can anchor a set of responses across representational systems at the peak of someones emotional state, the responses can be replicated when those stimuli are repeated with greater efficiency due to the multiple representational systems used in the anchor (making it more unique).

This is the core of the "remember exactly where you are right now (visual / auditory / kinesthetic anchor), pick an object and focus on it (visual) and I guarantee that the next time you see that object (presupposing to the listener that it will happen / visual anchor) you will hear the word (auditory) Senseo" "Soundvertising" technique that Adam is experimenting with.

There is a ton of work that has been done in the field of NLP and representational systems. Not all of it is understandable to the layman (I include myself in that category), but there are some really great books that make the material more accessible to the masses. The book that, in my opinion, explains the technique the best (and actually explains many of the concepts in NLP in the most understandable way) is still Tony Robbins book Unlimited Power : The New Science Of Personal Achievement. While its been about 12 or so years since I’ve read it and I’ve read many others since on the subject, this is still my favorite book of them all in explaining the hard core concepts of NLP in a way that non-scientists or non-therapists can understand.

So, in summary Adam, you are definitely on to something, and its quite astute of you to notice it if you haven’t had exposure to this material. However, it has been around for quite a while. Unfortunately, the way many NLP practitioners marketed NLP got it a characterization of “pop-psychology’ (or how Tony Robbins described it, a religion) more than a real model of how the brain works.

Still, there is some useful information if you actually study the stuff represented in the materials available on the subject. If you’d like to know more, there are quite a few books available on Amazon.

Related posts

Tagged with:

Manager Tools Podcast

Over the last couple of days I’ve been catching up on a podcast I found through iTunes called Manager Tools created by Michael Auzenne and Mark Horstman. Each episode is about 30 minutes or so and give advice and useful process around things you should be doing to improve your skills as a manager.

Over the last two days I’ve listened to about four episodes around the subjects of one on one meetings and effective delegation. Both subjects were made very interesting by the hosts. The great thing about this podcast is that each subject, by design, comes with actionable things you can do to begin implementing what they are talking about. The subject of One on Ones were split actually between three episodes, two on the subject and one on Q&A they received after the episodes were released. This was great content and the hosts give you tools for organizing the information with one on ones and some of the pitfalls you might run into while implementing them.

This is another one of those “niche” type of broadcasts that make podcasting so valuable. You don’t find this kind of programming on the radio.

I think the only negative feedback I have on the show is that their podcast RSS feed does not include all of the episodes, forcing me to go outside of the iTunes podcast interface in order to get older shows. This causes a little extra work in retrieving and cleanup of older episodes since these are managed outside of the iTunes podcast interface. I suppose this could also be user ignorance, but I prefer not to think about it that way … ;)

Aside from the limitation on the RSS feed though, the content is great and I highly recommend that you listen to these podcasts if you have direct reports. I read a lot of management books, and while I’ve read a few good ones, I haven’t walked away from any of the books I’ve read the way I’ve walked away from the morning drive listening to these shows. They contain a really good, practical, actionable, and surprisingly interesting content by a couple of guys who really like what they do and want to share what they’ve learned over their careers.

Related posts

Tagged with: ,

Killer Innovations Podcast

Looking around on iTunes this morning for some business podcasts to listen to I came across the Killer Innovations podcast put on by Phil McKinney.

I’ve only listened to a couple of episodes today during the commute, but overall I’m really liking it a lot. The episodes I’ve heard have given some pretty good information on how to build an innovation culture, coming up with financial metrics for innovations, and things like that. I still have quite a ways to go to get through all the episodes, but if your looking for a good business podcast and are being asked to provide new ‘innovation’ by your boss and don’t know where to start, this is it.

Related posts

Tagged with: ,

Bieber Labs on iTunes

Bieber Labs on iTunes

Photo by rbieber

Look Ma, I’m on iTunes!

My brother commented on the last post congratulating me for being on iTunes. I gotta admit, that’s kind of cool.

Wow, first the PSP, now iTunes. Whats next???

For the record, checking the server logs today I’ve received a whopping four downloads of the first episode that can be attributed to iTunes.

I think that makes an overall total of four. ;)

Related posts

Tagged with:

  • This article states that CBS is planning to podcast Guiding Light as one of its first forays into podcasting. Comments Off

The Gillmor Gang - Another Example of High Value Podcasting

Over the last week or so I’ve started listening to a podcast called the Gillmor Gang over on ITConversations. I’m getting a ton of value out of it and figured I would make a quick mention of it here.

The two episodes I’ve listened to so far are the January 21 episode, in which the Gang talks about RSS and blogging, and the February 4, 2005 episode on which Dan Bricklin is the guest and the gang talks about innovation.

Both podcasts were quite interesting and explain 4-5 very different views on the technology discussed. The really nice part about this podcast compared to other tech podcasts is the fact that each of the participants are long time members of the technical landscape, including Steve Gillmor, contributing editor at ZDNet, Doc Searls, senior editor at Linux Journal, Jon Udell, lead analyst, InfoWorld Test Center, and Dana Gardner, senior analyst at the Yankee Group.

The podcast format is these four guys (and one guest) on the phone just talking about the trends they see upcoming in the industry as related to the show topic.

This show is just one of many that I am finding valuable. I am more and more amazed with the concept of podcasting in general with each new show I find. Over the years, I have been extremely current on some technology while, since I work for a large corporation, I have not quite had the time to keep up on many of the trends going on. Mostly I rely on my people to give me a heads up to something (and to communicate it in such a way that I think it is important enough to spend time on). Consequently, there have been a lot of things I haven’t been able to keep up on in the last couple of years.

The quality of podcasts from an information standpoint that I have come across are outstanding. The time shifted nature of the medium allows me to listen to the content when I have time, during an hour+ commute to work. If a show is longer than my commute — no problem. I turn off the iPod and when I get back in the car and plug it in, its right where I left off in the show. If something is referred to in a previous episode — no problem. They are all available for me to go back and download. This is an area in which mass media radio just doesn’t give me the same value.

There are quite a few podcasts that I have been turned on to over the past few months that have given me much needed perspective shifts. One of them is the Gillmor Gang. For overviews of things going on in the news, I like GeekNewsCentral. For software development related information, I’m really enjoying the DrunkAndRetired podcast.

Each one of these I have had referred to me by someone in the blogosphere, by people I don’t even know. What a great world we live in nowadays!

When I first received this little white box for fathers day in June, my mind raced with the possibilities of not having a bazillion Cd’s in my car. I had no idea how much a little device could open up the world to information on my terms - when I had the time to listen. As it stands right now, I rarely listen to the music I spent a whole weekend ripping off of my CD collection.

Related posts

Tagged with:

Clayton Christensen - Capturing the Upside

Yesterday during my commute I listened to a presentation that Clayton Christensen did at the 2004 Open Source Business Conference called Open Source: Capturing the Upside While Avoiding the Downside that was published at ITConversations. Its basically a two hour presentation on the theories published in his books The Innovator’s Dilemma and The Innovator’s Solution, which attempts to explain why at a certain point in a companies life, good management can tank the company and how managers can continue creating growth companies by using the theory of disruption to figure out their strategies.

The first book goes into great detail into explaining his theory of “disruption”, using the floppy disk drive industry, PC industry, and steel industry for concrete examples of disruptive technologies and the conditions in which these technologies are introduced so that they can begin to take a market while not being noticed or cared about by the incumbents in the market.

The books are fascinating, and the keynote mentioned above is an excellent 2 hour audio primer on the content of the books. I was riveted to the presentation in the car as Christensen presents, in very simple yet effective terms, his theory and provides examples of situations in which the theory has applied.

An added bonus in the two hour presentation, since it is at an open source convention, is the explanation of how open source fits into the model of disruption, with contributions from people such as Tim O’Reilly and one employee from MySQL.

The most interesting thing I got out of this presentation was the explanation of commodization and decommodization, as it is explained in terms that I finally get. I had a hard time with these areas in the book, which could be because I was attempting to read multiple books at the same time, or just that I didn’t get it in print. The explanation of these concepts made complete sense as they were explained verbally and I found this section quite enlightening, especially when applying them to things I am seeing in certain areas around my professional life.

I would highly recommend that those in management, especially those responsible for defining strategy for the organization, grab this podcast and give it a listen. The concepts involved are quite interesting and general enough that you can apply them to your professional life. This was probably the most beneficial two hours I’ve spent commuting to work. The content was good enough that I did not even mind the drive.

Related posts

Tagged with:

Adam Curry Discussion on ITConversations

A friend of mine pointed me over to ITConversations as a source for good tech podcasts. The first one I downloaded was the 90 minute interview with Adam Curry about the origins and possible future of podcasting. I found the whole conversation really interesting. I especially enjoyed his explanation of the role that is being filled by the Podsafe Music Network as essentially an implementation of the current processes used in the radio industry.

Today I’ve grabbed two additional podcasts to listen to on the way to and from work from this site. The first, an interview with Clayton Christensen (author of The Innovator’s Dilemma) called Capturing the Upside and following that, a panel discussion on Folksonomies.

Have I mentioned how nice it is to have commercial free programming to listen to on the way to work that is tailored to my tastes? I haven’t listened to the radio in weeks.

Related posts

Tagged with:

The Drunk and Retired Podcast

Ed Gibbs, who runs the Musings of a Software Development Manager blog, recommended a podcast called Drunk and Retired, put on by two 10 year veterans of software development, Charles and Cote.

I’ve downloaded a few of the podcasts and spent this morning listening to the first two episodes, The Life Agile Parts One and Two. The podcast is pretty interesting. Charles spent some time over at ThoughtWorks and the first two episodes focus primarily on Agile Programming practices, including Test Driven Development, Scripting Languages, and XP and Scrum.

It’s kind of nice to find a podcast in which two regular guys who seem to know what they are talking about sit down over a couple of drinks, tell war stories and give opinions on different software development concepts and methodologies. I’m finding the podcast, so far, to be really interesting.

I’m currently listening to episode eight, which is titled “Learning From Open Source” in which Cote and Charles discuss the effect that Open Source software processes could have on commercial software development, a subject that I have been interested in for the last few years. This is one that I may create a follow up post about to summarize the points, as right now there seems to be a lot of interesting points here.

Check it out if you have some time to kill during your commute.

Related posts

Tagged with: ,

Plans for the Next Podcast

Ok, I have plans to produce another podcast with Kelsi when she comes over in the next couple of weeks. The plan is to sit and talk with her about local bands in St. Charles that she goes and sees, and to play music from some of her friends. She hangs out with a few musicians, ya know.

The sound quality should be quite a bit better, once I receive new equipment that I purchased after doing some research on what some people are using for their setups. I elected to purchase some of the equipment used by Tony Steidler-Dennison, who produces The Roadhouse.

Thanks to Tony for posting his setup info up on the web.

Plans are currently tentative, but I will be spending some time over the next couple weeks preparing and figuring out how to use the equipment and we’ll see what happens.

Related posts

Tagged with:

  • As I’m looking for new podcasts, I came across The Distorted View. It’s short (15 or so minutes), but very well produced. iTunes users click here to add it to your podcast list. Comments Off